Guide

Fire Statistics by State

Compare reported fires, deaths, injuries, and property losses - with the source limits needed to read state differences responsibly.

According to USFA/NFIRS · extract 2026

According to USFA National Fire Statistics in this extract, California leads reported annual fires at 168,000 (#1 of 51) while West Virginia leads the per-million fire-death rate at 31.1 (#1 of 51); California's death-rate rank on that ladder is #40.

168,000
California fires (#1 of 51)
31.1
West Virginia deaths/million (#1 of 51)
#40
California death-rate rank
4.2
Hawaii deaths/million (lowest)

Volume rank is not death-rate rank. NFIRS participation varies by state. Registry figures, not a safety grade. For informational purposes; does not constitute fire-safety or insurance advice.

The property-loss picture

California reports the highest total fire property loss of any state, $3.86B across 168,000 reported fires - 17.1% of the $22.6B national total.

$3.86B
California property loss
168,000
California reported fires
$22.6B
National total loss
10
States compared

Reported fire property loss by state, USFA National Fire Statistics, a dollar-scale lens distinct from the fires-count and death-rate ladders above.

States with the highest reported fire property loss

Total reported property loss from fires, top 10 states

M in losses

What this shows Property loss scales with fire volume, population density, and structure value, not with a state's raw fire count alone.

Source U.S. Fire Administration, National Fire Statistics As of 2026-09-08

Background and Context

USFA publishes state-level fire statistics including total fires, fire deaths, injuries, and property losses, and these figures reveal significant variation in fire safety outcomes across the United States. PlainFireData draws from HIFLD, USFA, and FEMA datasets to provide fire department profiles, state fire safety rankings, and grant award histories. This guide explains what the data reveals and how to interpret it responsibly.

Fire service in the United States is highly decentralized. There is no single national fire department. Instead, 32,253 individual departments serve communities ranging from dense urban cores to remote rural areas. Federal data captures the scale of this distributed system, but each department operates independently under state and local authority.

Understanding this landscape requires knowing what each federal dataset measures, what it misses, and how to cross-reference sources for a more complete picture. The following sections break down the key concepts and data dimensions relevant to this topic.

What Federal Fire Data Shows

What it tells you: HIFLD station-level data includes location, personnel counts, truck inventory, and EMS designation for 36,454 stations after FDID aggregation. USFA provides state-level aggregates: total fires, fire deaths, injuries, and property losses. FEMA grant data shows which departments receive federal funding and for what purposes. Together, these sources create a multi-dimensional picture of fire service capacity across the country.

What it doesn't tell you: Federal data does not capture response times, training levels, equipment condition, or the quality of mutual aid agreements between departments. Staffing numbers in HIFLD reflect reported figures that may not match current rosters. Volunteer departments may show zero paid staff while having dozens of active volunteers.

How to use it: Browse fire department profiles for your area to see station counts, equipment, and personnel. Check state fire statistics for context on fire safety outcomes in your state. Review county coverage maps to understand the geographic distribution of fire stations near you.

Key Metrics and How to Interpret Them

When evaluating fire department data, several metrics provide the most insight. Station count per square mile indicates geographic coverage density. Personnel count (career vs. volunteer) indicates response capacity. Truck inventory (engines, ladders, tankers) indicates equipment capability. FEMA grant history indicates investment in modernization and training.

However, these metrics must be interpreted in context. A rural volunteer department may cover a large, sparsely populated service area, while an urban career department may cover a compact, dense one. Comparing their raw counts without accounting for service area and local demand is misleading.

The most meaningful comparisons are between departments serving similar community types: urban-to-urban, suburban-to-suburban, and rural-to-rural. PlainFireData groups departments by state and county to facilitate these comparisons.

Practical Applications of Fire Department Data

Fire department data serves several practical purposes for residents, researchers, and policymakers. Homeowners can assess fire protection coverage when choosing where to live or evaluating home insurance risk. Researchers can analyze geographic patterns in fire service capacity and outcomes. Policymakers can identify underserved areas that may benefit from additional funding or mutual aid agreements.

Insurance companies use fire protection data to set premiums through the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification system, which rates communities from 1 (best) to 10 (no fire protection). While PlainFireData does not include ISO ratings, the underlying HIFLD data on station locations, equipment, and staffing is one of the inputs ISO uses in its classifications.

How to read these figures

These pages are for informational purposes and do not constitute fire-safety, insurance, or emergency advice. Rank and rate figures are sourced from USFA/NFIRS state annuals and the HIFLD registry extract. Open a state or department record to see the same vintage at that geography.

Underlying Data Sources for State Fire-Safety Comparison

State-level fire-safety comparison on this page draws from the U.S. Fire Administration's National Fire Statistics rollup. USFA publishes annual structure-fire counts, fire-death counts, civilian injury counts, firefighter casualty counts, and estimated property loss by state. The data underlying these rollups is the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS), to which fire departments voluntarily report incident records.

NFIRS participation completeness varies by state. The U.S. Fire Administration publishes per-state participation rates as part of its annual statistical methodology disclosure. High-participation states (Pennsylvania, Texas, California, Florida) produce more reliable rates; lower-participation states (Mississippi, Wyoming, rural Plains states) require careful interpretation. Per-capita normalization should be paired with the participation-rate adjustment.

State fire-marshal offices publish complementary state-specific statistics that often differ from USFA federal rollups. The differences typically reflect what the state captures that NFIRS does not (e.g., commercial fire investigations) and vice versa. When state-level numbers diverge between sources, we cite both.

We refresh USFA statistics when USFA publishes its annual update (typically late fall for the prior calendar year). State fire-marshal statistics are referenced where they materially differ. See the methodology page for current vintage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does PlainFireData get its fire department data?

Three federal sources: HIFLD (DHS/CISA) for 36,454 stations after FDID aggregation, USFA for state-level fire statistics, and FEMA OpenFEMA for grant awards.

How current is fire department data?

HIFLD is updated periodically by DHS/CISA. USFA statistics reflect the most recent reporting year. Some stations may have changed since the last update.

Why might my local department not appear?

HIFLD coverage is not 100%. Smaller volunteer departments may not report. Absence from PlainFireData does not mean a lack of fire protection. Contact your local department directly.

Regional Variations in Fire-Safety Outcomes

Per-capita fire-death rates show stark regional differences. In this USFA extract, West Virginia leads the per-million fire-death rate at 31.1 (#1 of 51), while Hawaii sits at 4.2 deaths per million. That is a 7.4× spread on the same ladder. The gap reflects structural factors: housing stock age, supplemental heating in cold-weather rural areas, smoke-alarm adoption rates, and state fire-code adoption, plus uneven NFIRS participation.

State fire-code adoption explains a meaningful share of the variation. California and Maryland are the only two states with statewide residential- sprinkler mandates for new single-family construction; both consistently rank among the lowest per-capita fire-death states. States that have adopted the 2018 or later International Residential Code (IRC) - which also mandates residential sprinklers in newer cohorts, show measurably lower fire-death rates in newer housing stock. Older states without such mandates show fire-death concentration in pre-1990 single-family stock.

Cause distribution shifts by climate zone. Cooking fires dominate everywhere (typically 49% of residential structure fires per NFPA), but heating-equipment fires climb to 14-18% of incidents in cold-weather states (North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Maine) where supplemental heating runs longer. The seasonal pattern shows December-January as the annual peak in heating fires nationally, with the holiday season producing the cooking-fire peak.

Methodology note: USFA fire-statistics rollups use NFIRS data submitted by participating fire departments. Reporting completeness varies by state. Comparisons between states should account for the underlying NFIRS participation rate; states with higher participation produce more reliable per-capita rates. See the methodology page for normalization adjustments.

State-by-State Fire Death Rate Reference

Why state rates vary so widely

In this extract, fire-death rates per million residents run from 4.2 in Hawaii to 31.1 in West Virginia. The spread reflects housing stock age, smoke-alarm penetration, EMS distance, the urban-rural mix, and NFIRS participation.

How NFIRS classifies fatal incidents

NFIRS Module 5 records cause, ignition factor, and human-factor data for every fatal fire reported through the National Fire Incident Reporting System. Coverage varies, about 75% of departments submit complete records.

Where USFA publishes the comparable totals

USFA's annual "Fire in the United States" rolls NFIRS into state-level totals adjusted for non-reporting departments. Treat it as the headline reference, then drill to the local NFIRS file for incident detail.

What policymakers actually use

State fire marshals lean on the per-capita death rate plus loss-per-fire to prioritize prevention investment. The two together separate states with many small fires from states with few but catastrophic ones.

Reference Table, Live State Extrema

Live USFA state extrema: fire volume versus death rate versus loss per fire.
State Role in this extract Deaths / million Reported loss / fire
California Fires #1 of 51 (168,000) 8.8 (#40 of 51) $22,988
West Virginia Death-rate #1 of 51 31.1 $9,108
Pennsylvania Departments #1 of 55 (2,427) See state record See state record

Worked Example: Volume Lead vs Death-Rate Lead

Step 1, Pull the headline figures

California records 168,000 reported fires and 8.8 fire deaths per million (#40 of 51 on the rate ladder). West Virginia records 31.1 deaths per million (#1 of 51) on the same extract.

Step 2, Keep the denominators honest

Per-million rates use Census population on the state row (floor 500,000 residents). A small-population row is excluded from the rate ladder even if it reports deaths.

Step 3, Add property loss to the picture

Reported loss per fire is $22,988 in California and $9,108 in West Virginia. A higher death rate does not imply a higher dollar loss per incident.

Step 4, Read the spread

The high-to-low death-rate spread in this extract is 7.4× (West Virginia 31.1 vs Hawaii 4.2 per million). That comparison is a registry read, not a prevention prescription.

Sources: HIFLD, Fire Stations; USFA, National Fire Statistics; FEMA, Assistance to Firefighters Grants.

Extract vintage: 2026

Guide pages on PlainFireData combine live HIFLD/USFA counts with NFPA and USFA fire-prevention guidance. Registry and incident figures come from the published extracts; checklist and practice steps are editorial summaries of those agencies' public guidance, not invented statistics. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.